It doesn’t matter what you think is good or not. Because obviously the NFL scouts are not only smarter than you. They’re smarter than Gundy and his entire coaching staff. It also doesn’t matter if Virginia went 6-6. Because he was still an asset in getting that terrible program to a bowl game. Something Gundy failed to do this year with his entire team returning .
You’re the same dude that touts OSU players being signed as undrafted free agents, but you also tell us a former OSU who was actually drafted wasn’t any good . If you actually would think about what you’re saying, then I might take your opinions into consideration. The issue is they’re too inconsistent and don’t make any sense most of the time.
See you move all around to avoid what I said Stone Hands wasn’t an asset to us. We actually had guys that rarely dropped a ball. His blocking sucked Maybe we had better players to spend time on after he had been here 4 years and couldn’t catch or block
You can’t be an asset if the offense is not invested in getting the ball to you. Which is exactly why he transferred and was eventually DRAFTED. That alone proves that every negative comment you have about him is nothing but pure nonsense. Just accept that you don’t have a clue of what you’re talking about .
thought he had the potential to be another Brandon Pettigrew. You had the program down south using
This ^^^^^
Your evaluation is as bad as your knowledge of football. If you thought he was another Pettjgrew ? He couldn’t carry his practice gear for Pettigrew … lol Pettigrew started and played in league 8-10 years
How can you be when the ignorance of the coaching staff doesn’t allow you to be? We used to throw it to Pettigrew all the time. Also the word potential means possible. I never said he WOULD BE as good as Pettigrew. It’s impossible to be that kind of guy when a program doesn’t allow you to be . The first three years of his career at OSU were basically spent being another lineman because Gundy’s offensive lines sucked so bad. What do you think about that?
Nice way to change the subject though . He overall would’ve been an asset in the passing game (as Virginia had proven) but we can’t seem to do that. If the NFL scouts didn’t think he was ready enough for the NFL then they would’ve signed him as a free agent. You know….the free agents you still tout over drafted players?
However, for some reason in your little alternate reality. An OSU undrafted free agent holds more value over a former OSU player that was actually drafted . So who exactly here needs to have more football knowledge?
Talking about little minds , when have I ever said a drafted player wasn’t better than a free agent ? In your warped mind you made that up
You could have saved all that rhetoric you just posted by saying Pettigrew was just a better athlete ?? Wasn’t even close
We can tell by your comments. You call a drafted player Stone Hands, and then call an undrafted free agent from OSU “a possible asset” to any team they go to. You know the difference between a drafted player and an undrafted free agent? The fact that the player is actually drafted means that NFL scout and team believe they should invest more into him than an undrafted free agent . Who would’ve thought!!!
You admit to not reading everyone else’s full comments. However, people certainly are reading everything you post .
Who was talking about an undrafted player ? It wasn’t me you idiot. I was talking about Pettigrew and you bring something else in ?? That’s what you always do when you get caught speeding I haven’t mentioned an undrafted player
You compared Stone Hands to Pettigrew that he could have been him wasn’t any comparison
You make chit up to lie about. I’ve never said an undrafted guy was a difference maker. That a lie right there. You never answered the original question. You kept sidestepping to something other Narcissist
I didn’t say you said an undrafted free agent would be a difference maker. I said you tout OSU undrafted free agents over a guy that actually got drafted. The proof is in your own comments . I said “a possible asset” and I never said “difference maker”. Not only are you claiming stuff I never said, but you’re trying to change the narrative here.
You weaseled out of answering my original question so whatever the hell you just wrote I don’t know from your wording. You make chit up all the time anyway
.
.
. I said “a possible asset” and I never said “difference maker”. Not only are you claiming stuff I never said, but you’re trying to change the narrative here.