Thread Debate

[dmgrantham]

I would volunteer to host, but not fund. And, I bet I’m one of the senior members! (Age-wise)

[Alum_in_AZ]

Love the Chamber Conference idea! Seriously, though, I lean towards the side that more threads would be better and therefore easier to focus on a topic. The never-ending threads just meander and if you miss a theme or concept other than Gundy’s recruiting you might not see it again (for a while).

[cometpoke]

To be real honest I bet 80% of the comments in the wrestling thread are conversations between like 4 of us… So I wouldn’t gauge the need for more threads off of that thread in particular. There are the people that drop by and chat sometimes, but it’s really just a few of us who have nothing better to do than pretend we have a clue about it.

I hardly ever to never post in the wrestling thread but it is one of my favorite to read.

[AdamM]

I know nothing about wrestling so I’m a sponge to what y’all say (minus fuggen @TheHeadChimp because he baits me) about the sport and I enjoy learning more about the current squad.

[Dribble]

I prefer more threads than mega threads. Once a mega thread starts it limits the amount of people that will get involved.

[ballah]

I agree. If I don’t get on for a couple days it’s easier to jump into a new thread with 20 comments and catch up than it is to go to a mega thread with 200 new comments and try to scroll up and figure out what everyone is talking about.

[JustGary]

I guess some of us get on a little too frequently. Not sure I’ve gone half a day without being on. Something may be wrong with me.

[SherlockOhms]

Nah nothing’s wrong with you! (Mostly because that would mean the same thing was wrong with me)

[TheHeadChimp]

Dude…that would mean there’s something wrong with a fairly long list of us.

[AdamM]

You’re in good company with dozens others though. Maybe we need a Forums Anonymous for help.

[kyleporterCBS]

There are dozens of us.