Sincere questions: What do you all think about the comments by Michael21 on the PFB articles? Is this an individual or is this part of some coordinated group effort? What’s the best way to respond? Is there a term for this type of social media activism?
If you don’t know what I’m talking about, see screenshots below.
I love the last line on the last post, if he were to somehow find $17mil he’s concerned OSU wouldn’t use it to buyout Gundy, talk about counting your chicks before they hatch.
Downvote it if you don’t like it and hopefully it gets hidden. If pfb started taking down all the anti gundy posts they would need to hire an intern to do it… Also what about the hate toward Chuba, do we need to take those down? Censorship is a slippery slope, this guy has not really crossed any lines even if some people don’t like it.
I know that Porter is mulling it over, but I think the death of the free section (especially under articles) may be the end result and I don’t know that it would be a bad thing.
Ar1 and Joe15 are all over him now. They are all entitled to their opinions but I just don’t see how it helps anyone to keep pressing these issues in the PFB comments. He needs to email Holder if he wants to try to change something.
I’m all for letting the guy do his thing on the article threads but when he starts encouraging recruits to look elsewhere he’s gone too far and it needs to be addressed.
Some could argue they’re anti-censorship, which is fair, but in this case; how do we even know if this is a legit OSU fan?
It could be an OU troll, or (puts on tinfoil hat) a social media intern from another school that has also offered and is trying to throw shade at OSU…