Thank God. U do know that group a has 4 loses already and 3 of those loses are bad really bad
ITS LOSSES. When you clean it up and learn some grammar…
Ill give you another group that has 4 losses already
Ohio St
Clemson
Texas
Florida St
Again…what does your W-L record matter?
I thought u were done. But I’ve proven u have problems with the truth
At least that group only has one bad lose
It’s funny usc knew that was a bad lose too. But u told me usc was find
Ok…please have someone with at least a G.E.D. help you with whatever it is youre trying to say
I just love how u bend talking how great usc is.
Well, Ive never said theyre currently “Great”. If someone literate asked me my opinon of USC, heres what id tell them.
Historically great program. The right guy can win bigtime there. Great recruiting base within 100 miles. Nationwide ability to recruit. Power 5 Conf that you can win in pretty easily. Great exposure. Huge TV game every year with ND.
Dnt feel bad. Ar0 thought their oc would be a good coach here. He is not even going to be their interm.
The list is out and there mostly midwest guys.
They need to hire the rock.
So who is the next coach.
SHOULD be Luke Fickell. The current USC AD has hired him once already. But that place out there is a lot like Texas in that they sometimes are more worried about winning the press conference than they are hiring the right guy. Im not sure how “sexy” a hire Fickell is, so well see. One guy that WILL NOT TAKE IT, but his name will absolutely come up is Bob Stoops. The best candidate happens to be coaching the Jaguars right now
I know Luke is thought of. He has never lived outside of Ohio. And he coached tosu to a losing season while sandwiched between 11 win season by other coaches.
Bob would be a good fit, if his ego wants it. And they get over a 61 year old coach. Urban will have the same issue he had with texas.
Campbell is the only one who has shown no down side.
Bob wants no part of that.
Campbell does have some drawbacks if youre USC. Hes never recruited out that way. Hes not shown the ability to go be a dynamic recruiter so far. Being a rah-rah guy who specialized in turning 3 stars into players isnt really what you want at USC. You want a Lane Kiffin type. A Pete Carroll type. A Lincoln Riley type. Someone who goes in the house of a 5star Cali kid and blows him away. Im not knocking Campbell at all. Love the guy. But hes not a fit at USC. Thats a little bit of the problem that Fickell will have too, but hes at least been on a staff at Ohio St that was always recruiting the same level of talent that SC will. Different type of kid, but same type of talent. Campbell could win at USC. Im just playing Devils Advocate here and saying that its not like he has no down side
Yes that is the supposed down size.
But, aren’t u the one who say usc is a name brand.
I do love when people say that.
Then why did usc go after Peterson.
His game plan will be alot like Stanford.
They got Franklin as the top choice. He has done the same thing as Helton. And they fired Helton.
I think the psu and usc is really close to the same job.
U can make points for usc but psu has as many.
First off, I dont know who “they” are. USC hasnt and wont put out any list. So “they” is reports.
I, along with the rest of the college football world, say that USC is a name brand. Anyone who doesnt understand or acknowledge that fact has zero knowledge of college football.
“Then why did USC go after Peterson?” First off, your lack of punctuation, spelling, and random thoughts make your posts hard to understand and even harder to answer. I mean that nicely. Ill guess that youre asking why USC would go after Chris Peterson at any point. Dude…he took a lesser PAC 12 program to the playoff. Hes very familiar with recruiting the West Coast. Hes a proven winner. Thats why youd go after him. I dont disagree that his offense is like his personality. Its a little vanilla for me. You just asked why did USC go after him. Those are the reasons why.
I disagree on what type of jobs they are. USC is better. Its shown itself historically to be better. NOT BY A WIDE MARGIN. Penn St is a good job. Whatever criteria you wanna use, USC has been better at it. Nat Titles. Conf Titles. Heisman Winners. Recruiting base. NFL Draft. They pay similarly. Both have had their issues with the NCAA.
U and ur ocd.
Reporters are they. Anybody as smart as u r should have known this.
Maybe I have my timeline wrong. I thought they went for Peterson before washington got him.
Then u go on and on about usc being so much better job then psu. In the end saying the same thing as me, there close to the same job.
I think with ur ego and thin skin u have a hard time talking normal. Which is kind of an oxymoron thought. Thin skin egomaniac.
Like u said playing devils advocate. It’s like he Texas job. The donors and schools have that job so screwed up its hard for one to one it and win.
You said they were similar. I said USC is a BETTER JOB THAN PENN ST. So we havent said the same thing. The only thing that I said is that they pay and have had issues with the NCAA. That doesnt mean I think theyre on the same level. They are not. USC IS A BETTER JOB. Just to be clear
I suppose u would have to look at it like a coach too.
How many coaches would trun down the usc job.
There both blue bloods. Both living on legacies.
Since Carroll how many coaches have they gone through.
As for reporters list I dnt think any would want it or would fit.
Kiffin was the only real coach that got canned. Orgeron was an interim guy. Then Helton before they hired Sark. Sark got himself fired with the off-field stuff. So they went safe again with Helton.
Did u just read what u wrote. Does any of that sound like the ad knows what their doing.
Kiffin is the only real that got canned. The others were actors? I mean u can justify all of this. To us causal fans it looks like a pile of chit, with people running it r a joke.
I have no idea what or point is with this post. I do know ur making an excuse. I just can figure out for who ur making excuses for. Not sure who for the not real coaches, the real coach, the ad, or all of usc nation.